লেকার্সের অদ্ভুত বিপর্যয়

$10-বিলিয়নের প্যারাডক্স: একটি ‘হোম’বিহীনওয়াজ
আমি NYC-এর data-driven sports analyst; NBA-এর valuations-এ analyze-এ years spent. But here’s the shocker: LA Lakers—$10B valued—has no ownership of their arena.
Yes. They play at Crypto.com Arena (ex-Staples Center), but don’t own it. Not a typo. A systemic flaw wrapped in global brand power.
Brand Value > Real Estate
ESPN says even non-owner franchises can hit $10B? That’s not asset value—it’s cultural capital.
Lakers aren’t just a team—they’re a lifestyle brand: global reach, merch dominance, streaming revenue from Amazon Prime/Netflix, social media following larger than many nations.
Yet—no control over home court.
The Hidden Power Play in the Sale
Mark Walter didn’t win this by chance. As TWG Global CEO and already owning 26% since 2021, he had priority rights—a clause from Phil Anschutz deal.
No open bidding. Insider access disguised as fairness.
Now Walter controls Buss family legacy—a dynasty built on winning and spectacle—but zero say in where games happen.
Not ironic? Structural dysfunction at scale.
What’s the Real Cost?
Imagine running your business on rented space daily. What if rent rises? Politics shift? Sponsors demand exclusivity?
Lakers run an empire on someone else’s lease—and are worth more than ever because of it.
Questions arise:
- Is this model sustainable?
- Who benefits—the players, fans, or investors?
- Is this why player moves feel so transactional now? With no long-term venue security, teams treat arenas like temporary stages for branding campaigns.
But Is This Unfair?
Let logic speak: maybe it’s not broken—it’s optimized. In modern sports capitalism, brand equity often beats real estate control. The Celtics have TD Garden? Great. Warriors have Chase Center? Better. But neither matches Lakers’ global recognition—at least not yet—with fewer owned venues than any major league franchise except baseball (and even MLB teams usually have stakes). The point isn’t ownership—it’s perception—and perception is everything today. The question isn’t whether they should own their arena anymore; it’s whether we care enough to demand it.
EchoWest_77
জনপ্রিয় মন্তব্য (4)

يا جماعة! لوس أنجليس بقيمة 10 مليار دولار، ومش عندهم ملعبهم؟! دخلوا في كريبتون أرينا، لكنه مستأجر من زمان! المصفوفة تبيع قميصها، واللاعبين يركضون على أرض مستعارة، والجملة تشتغل بالستريم! حتى الإبلانات تقول إنّهم ما نملكوا غير رأسهم… والدودي يقول: “بديل عن الملكية؟ لا، بديل عن التأجير اللي ما ينفعش!” شو هالله؟ شكون حاطر؟ الكرة؟ خليص؟

Лейкерс стоят на $10 млрд, но не имеют своей арены? Это как если бы Пушкин написал сценарий для “Безумной Игры” — тут не баскетбол, а культурный фокус! Вместо дома — лизинг от Amazon Prime. Даже мишка в шубе считает коэффициенты давления… А где же их ковчег? В Кремле? Слушайте: “Мы платим за место — но не за землю!” А вы бы поставили шайбу в Беломорье?


